The first drop is taking shape.Join the tasting list

Good thinking

Better questions make better sweets.

A compact reading room for the evidence, ethics and practical choices behind the brand direction.

TASTE
FIRST.

Brand & appetite

Why flavour language leads.

People choose food with their senses before they assess its story. The brand should respect that order.

NO
SHAME.

Food & identity

Why “guilt-free” is not our voice.

A sweet does not need to moralise somebody’s body or appetite to communicate a thoughtful choice.

PROOF
CLOSE.

Choice architecture

Why useful facts stay visible.

Information works best when it appears at the moment of choice — not behind five taps and a vague badge.

01 · Taste language

Make the mouth water before making the argument.

A large multisite field experiment found taste-focused descriptions increased selection compared with basic or health-focused labels. The study examined vegetables rather than confectionery, so applying it here is a design inference — but a useful one: “jammy raspberry, proper chew” is more inviting than leading with a nutrient claim.

Read the taste-focused labelling study ↗

02 · Portions without policing

Design the format around choice, not permission.

Systematic evidence links larger portions with greater food and energy intake. That supports resealable and partitioned formats, clear pieces-per-serving information and nutrition for both a serving and the whole pack. It does not support shaming somebody for how much they eat.

Read the USDA systematic review ↗

03 · No weight-loss identity

A brand can encourage clarity without making bodies the sales device.

Research consistently associates weight stigma with harmful eating-related thoughts and behaviours. The Better Take therefore avoids “cheat day,” appetite-suppression and weight-loss language, as well as idealised before-and-after bodies.

Read the systematic review on weight stigma ↗

04 · Claims and clarity

The final pack has to say exactly what the evidence supports.

In Great Britain, nutrition and health claims are regulated. The brand will treat “sugar free,” “healthy” and any broader benefit wording as substantiation work — not casual marketing decoration. Allergen information will be available before purchase once products exist.

View the GB claims register ↗ · Read FSA allergen guidance ↗

05 · Honest conversion

Remove uncertainty, not somebody’s agency.

A future shop should make price, delivery, cancellation and product status obvious; use genuine reviews only; and avoid fake scarcity, permanent countdowns or preselected consent. Making the choice easy is good commerce. Manufacturing pressure is not.

Read the CMA online-choice guidance ↗